4/28/10

Increased gov't theft now "on the table" despite Obama promises

CIVICS NEWS Comment: The devil "comes to steal and kill and destroy." Well, so does the government. As one of Satan's favorite playgrounds, the state represents institutionalized theft and murder. Also, as Satan is the father of lies, so do presidential candidates speak lies as their native language. Obama said no new taxes (i.e. stealing), but now it's "on the table" to reduce the deficit. Here's an idea, Mr. President. Instead of breaking your word (i.e. lying) by stealing more money from people so that your military can keep killing people overseas, why don't you just end the murderous empire abroad and in doing so, 1) reduce the amount of money that your IRS agents need to steal from people to fund that military machine, 2) cease killing people, and 3) keep your campaign promises rather than lying. Maybe I shouldn't even make the recommendation. Is the government even capable of not stealing, killing, and lying? Either way, Christians and people of good conscience must realize what they're dealing with when it comes to politics. It's not a saintly institution and never will be. Put not your trust in princes.


Obama Debt Czar Says Tax Hikes “On The Table”
President’s promise that families who earned less than $250,000 a year would not be hit set to be shattered

Paul Joseph Watson - Prison Planet.com - Monday, April 26, 2010



The Democratic co-chairman of President Obama’s debt commission, Erskine Bowles, told Fox News Sunday that tax hikes for Americans are “on the table,” despite Obama’s election campaign promise that no individual earning under $200,000 dollars a year would be hit with any tax increases.

Asked if he felt bound by the President’s pledge, Bowles responded, “Everything is on the table, we’re going to look at every single way to right this fiscal ship….raising revenue, we have to have everything on the table.”

Bowles also said that a European-style VAT tax, which would increase living costs by as much as 25 per cent, was also under consideration.

“I think that there are many good arguments that you could make for a value-added tax or a consumption tax as oppose to a tax on wages but I think it’s just one of the things that ought to be on the table that we ought to discuss.”



Bowles’ suggestion that a VAT tax would supplant or be offset by a reduction in income tax is likely a ruse. People in Europe pay the highest levels of income tax in the world but they are also forced to pay VAT on most goods at a level between 15-25 per cent in addition to costly income tax rates.

VAT taxes are typically introduced at low rates in order to dampen opposition, but then gradually raised over the course of decades. For example, Denmark’s VAT tax started at 9 per cent in 1962, but today has bloated to a whopping 25 per cent.

The 18 members of the debt commission will unveil their plan by December 1.

The prospect of income tax hikes contradicts Obama’s pre-election promise that he would not raise taxes for American families earning under a quarter of a million dollars a year.

During a speech on the campaign trail, Obama guaranteed, “No family making under $250,000 dollars a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

“You will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime,” Obama repeatedly vowed.



As we have highlighted, even aside from any income tax hikes, Americans already face a myriad of tax increases under Obamacare, a potential VAT tax, not to mention a future consumption tax based on CO2 emissions.

As the Associated Press reported On April 1, the largest ever increase in tobacco tax, and one that would disproportionately affect the poor, was passed by Obama despite his pledge to protect lower earners.

Last week, Obama himself said that a value-added tax, which would hit Americans across the income bracket but particularly the poor and struggling middle class, was “still on the table” just days after White House aides had assured otherwise.

Inspiring Repentance: 2 soldiers apologize for wikileaks incident and Iraq war

AN OPEN LETTER OF RECONCILIATION & RESPONSIBILITY TO THE IRAQI PEOPLE

From Current and Former Members of the U.S. Military

Peace be with you.

To all of those who were injured or lost loved ones during the July 2007 Baghdad shootings depicted in the “Collateral Murder” Wikileaks video:

We write to you, your family, and your community with awareness that our words and actions can never restore your losses.

We are both soldiers who occupied your neighborhood for 14 months. Ethan McCord pulled your daughter and son from the van, and when doing so, saw the faces of his own children back home. Josh Stieber was in the same company but was not there that day, though he contributed to the your pain, and the pain of your community on many other occasions.

There is no bringing back all that was lost. What we seek is to learn from our mistakes and do everything we can to tell others of our experiences and how the people of the United States need to realize we have done and are doing to you and the people of your country. We humbly ask you what we can do to begin to repair the damage we caused.

We have been speaking to whoever will listen, telling them that what was shown in the Wikileaks video only begins to depict the suffering we have created. From our own experiences, and the experiences of other veterans we have talked to, we know that the acts depicted in this video are everyday occurrences of this war: this is the nature of how U.S.-led wars are carried out in this region.

We acknowledge our part in the deaths and injuries of your loved ones as we tell Americans what we were trained to do and what we carried out in the name of “god and country”. The soldier in the video said that your husband shouldn’t have brought your children to battle, but we are acknowledging our responsibility for bringing the battle to your neighborhood, and to your family. We did unto you what we would not want done to us.

More and more Americans are taking responsibility for what was done in our name. Though we have acted with cold hearts far too many times, we have not forgotten our actions towards you. Our heavy hearts still hold hope that we can restore inside our country the acknowledgment of your humanity, that we were taught to deny.

Our government may ignore you, concerned more with its public image. It has also ignored many veterans who have returned physically injured or mentally troubled by what they saw and did in your country. But the time is long overdue that we say that the value of our nation’s leaders no longer represent us. Our secretary of defense may say the U.S. won’t lose its reputation over this, but we stand and say that our reputation’s importance pales in comparison to our common humanity.

We have asked our fellow veterans and service-members, as well as civilians both in the United States and abroad, to sign in support of this letter, and to offer their names as a testimony to our common humanity, to distance ourselves from the destructive policies of our nation’s leaders, and to extend our hands to you.

With such pain, friendship might be too much to ask. Please accept our apology, our sorrow, our care, and our dedication to change from the inside out. We are doing what we can to speak out against the wars and military policies responsible for what happened to you and your loved ones. Our hearts are open to hearing how we can take any steps to support you through the pain that we have caused.

Solemnly and Sincerely,

Josh Stieber, former specialist, U.S. Army
Ethan McCord, former specialist, U.S. Army

4/26/10

4/14/10

MSNBC airs expose of the Fed and bankster "con men"

It's amazing that this was actually on TV.



4/11/10

Gotta love this headline

From Washington's Blog:

Bernanke: We Must Raise Taxes and Cut Services
Sane People: No, We Need to Stop Endless Bail Outs, Imperial Adventures and Fraudulent Schemes

Cheney administration knew Gitmo prisoners were innocent

George W. Bush ‘knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent’
Tim Reid - London Times - April 9, 2010



George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.

The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration.

Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”. [...]

How about a libertarian on the Supreme Court?

Ron Paul vs. GOP Establishment

Ron Paul chastises at GOP conference: Conservatives ‘like the empire’
Andrew McLemore - Raw Story - April 11, 2010

Texas Rep. Ron Paul proved once again Saturday that his politics continue to divide the Republican Party.

He was met with both disapproval and applause during the Southern Republican Leadership Conference for describing conservatives as hypocritical when they call for a return to Constitutional values while supporting foreign wars.

The conservatives and the liberals, they both like to spend. Conservatives spend money on different things. They like embassies, and they like occupation. They like the empire. They like to be in 135 countries and 700 bases.

Don’t you think it’s rather conservative to say, ‘Oh it’s good to follow the Constitution. Oh, except for war. Let the President go to war anytime they want.’ We can do better with peace than with war.

While most of the other speakers at the event used plenty of rhetoric for “easy applause,” as Washington Post reporter David Weigel put it, Paul stuck to the outrage over American foreign policy that has defined his platform.

Whenever the boos grew loud enough, Paul returned to his “humble” foreign policy stance.
“It’s been 60 years since we went to war in Korea,” said Paul. “Why do we have to have troops there?”

Enough of Paul’s supporters showed up for the conference that many of his fellow speakers were met with boos on issues of government spending. In a straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February, Paul walked away with the most support for a 2012 presidential bid: 31 percent.

Eying another bid for president after a run in 2008, Paul is telling Republican activists that “the American people have awoken” because Washington won’t address the nation’s fiscal crisis.

“The reason why the American people have awoken … is because the country is broke and the people in Washington won’t admit it.”

Paul added, however, that President Obama is not the “socialist” he has been labeled by Tea Party activists.

Most political commentators believe Paul is vying with Mitt Romney for the top slot of the straw poll of this weekend’s conference.

In a question-and-answer after his speech, a blogger asked Paul why his supporters seemed so disinterested in the Republican Party.

“The question you should be asking,” said Paul, “is, why isn’t the Republican Party interested in them? We can get huge crowds with this message.”

Romney buys votes to beat Ron Paul only by 1

"Evangelicals for Mitt" helped to hand Mitt Romney a one-vote victory over Ron Paul at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference.

The irony of this is tremendous.

First, long before "Obamacare," the liberal governor of the liberal state of Massachusetts enacted a health care system for his state which is largely mirrored by the Obama plan, and which was praised by Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy. That Massachusetts governor was none other than Mitt Romney. Once a liberal governor of the most liberal state in the country who was enacting Obamacare by another name. Now the winner of a Republican straw poll. Weird.

Second, it is strange that "evangelicals" who claim to follow Jesus' teachings would endorse a candidate who wants to continue and expand the American empire abroad, perpetuating violence, war, aggression and torture. Wouldn't a Christian naturally cast their vote for Ron Paul, the only peace candidate at the SRLC? (Or perhaps a Christian would cast no vote, but that's a whole different issue.)

All of this comes into clearer focus when we realize the fact that Romney is very wealthy and he bought tickets for people with the proviso that they would vote for him. The only way Romney could beat Paul is if he bought votes!

4/8/10

Napoleon, MLK Jr., and Jesus' Resurrection

Remember this? "I know men and I tell you that Jesus Christ is no mere man. Between him and every other person in the world there is no possible term of comparison. Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him."

--Napoleon Bonaparte

This quotation came to mind as I read the conclusion to a Martin Luther King Jr. sermon given on an Easter Sunday, which speaks of the difference between Jesus and the kings of this world. Take a look for yourself; it's a powerful message in the purest kingdom-of-God sense of the word, "power!"

Nanny state destroys Native American cultures

Support these brave soldiers who are repenting and speaking out against evil

Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People, and the Officers Would Take Care of Us"
Wednesday 07 April 2010
Dahr Jamail, t r u t h o u t Report



On Monday, April 5, Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency: photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.

The US military confirmed the authenticity of the video.

The footage clearly shows an unprovoked slaughter, and is shocking to watch whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the background.

As disturbing as the video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon.

Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces.

"I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces."

The hearings provided a platform for veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan to share the reality of their occupation experiences with the media in the US.

Washburn testified on a panel that discussed the rules of engagement (ROE) in Iraq, and how lax they were, to the point of being virtually nonexistent.

"During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continued, "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond. Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent."

Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, told of taking orders over the radio.

"One time they said to fire on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation.... One of the snipers replied back, 'Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?' The lieutenant colonel responded, 'You heard me, trooper, fire on all taxicabs.' After that, the town lit up, with all the units firing on cars. This was my first experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment."

Vincent Emanuele, a Marine rifleman who spent a year in the al-Qaim area of Iraq near the Syrian border, told of emptying magazines of bullets into the city without identifying targets, running over corpses with Humvees and stopping to take "trophy" photos of bodies.

"An act that took place quite often in Iraq was taking pot shots at cars that drove by," he said, "This was not an isolated incident, and it took place for most of our eight-month deployment."

Kelly Dougherty - then executive director of Iraq Veterans Against the War - blamed the behavior of soldiers in Iraq on policies of the US government.

"The abuses committed in the occupations, far from being the result of a 'few bad apples' misbehaving, are the result of our government's Middle East policy, which is crafted in the highest spheres of US power," she said.

Michael Leduc, a corporal in the Marines who was part of the US attack on Fallujah in November 2004, said orders he received from his battalion JAG officer before entering the city were as follows: "You see an individual with a white flag and he does anything but approach you slowly and obey commands, assume it's a trick and kill him."

Brian Casler, a corporal in the Marines, spoke of witnessing the prevalent dehumanizing outlook soldiers took toward Iraqis during the invasion of Iraq.

"... on these convoys, I saw Marines defecate into MRE bags or urinate in bottles and throw them at children on the side of the road," he stated.

Scott Ewing, who served in Iraq from 2005-2006, admitted on one panel that units intentionally gave candy to Iraqi children for reasons other than "winning hearts and minds.

"There was also another motive," Ewing said. "If the kids were around our vehicles, the bad guys wouldn't attack. We used the kids as human shields."

In response to the WikiLeaks video, the Pentagon, while not officially commenting on the video, announced that two Pentagon investigations cleared the air crew of any wrongdoing.

A statement from the two probes said the air crew had acted appropriately and followed the ROE.

Adam Kokesh served in Fallujah beginning in February 2004 for roughly one year.

Speaking on a panel at the aforementioned hearings about the ROE, he held up the ROE card soldiers are issued in Iraq and said, "This card says, 'Nothing on this card prevents you from using deadly force to defend yourself'."

Kokesh pointed out that "reasonable certainty" was the condition for using deadly force under the ROE, and this led to rampant civilian deaths. He discussed taking part in the April 2004 siege of Fallujah. During that attack, doctors at Fallujah General Hospital told Truthout there were 736 deaths, over 60 percent of which were civilians.

"We changed the ROE more often than we changed our underwear," Kokesh said, "At one point, we imposed a curfew on the city, and were told to fire at anything that moved in the dark."

Kokesh also testified that during two cease-fires in the midst of the siege, the military decided to let out as many women and children from the embattled city as possible, but this did not include most men.

"For males, they had to be under 14 years of age," he said, "So I had to go over there and turn men back, who had just been separated from their women and children. We thought we were being gracious."

Steve Casey served in Iraq for over a year starting in mid-2003.

"We were scheduled to go home in April 2004, but due to rising violence we stayed in with Operation Blackjack," Casey said, "I watched soldiers firing into the radiators and windows of oncoming vehicles. Those who didn't turn around were unfortunately neutralized one way or another - well over 20 times I personally witnessed this. There was a lot of collateral damage."

Jason Hurd served in central Baghdad from November 2004 until November 2005. He told of how, after his unit took "stray rounds" from a nearby firefight, a machine gunner responded by firing over 200 rounds into a nearby building.

"We fired indiscriminately at this building," he said. "Things like that happened every day in Iraq. We reacted out of fear for our lives, and we reacted with total destruction."

Hurd said the situation deteriorated rapidly while he was in Iraq. "Over time, as the absurdity of war set in, individuals from my unit indiscriminately opened fire at vehicles driving down the wrong side of the road. People in my unit would later brag about it. I remember thinking how appalled I was that we were laughing at this, but that was the reality."

Other soldiers Truthout has interviewed have often laughed when asked about their ROE in Iraq.

Garret Reppenhagen served in Iraq from February 2004-2005 in the city of Baquba, 40 kilometers (about 25 miles) northeast of Baghdad. He said his first experience in Iraq was being on a patrol that killed two Iraqi farmers as they worked in their field at night.

"I was told they were out in the fields farming because their pumps only operated with electricity, which meant they had to go out in the dark when there was electricity," he explained, "I asked the sergeant, if he knew this, why did he fire on the men. He told me because the men were out after curfew. I was never given another ROE during my time in Iraq."

Emmanuel added: "We took fire while trying to blow up a bridge. Many of the attackers were part of the general population. This led to our squad shooting at everything and anything in order to push through the town. I remember myself emptying magazines into the town, never identifying a target."

Emmanuel spoke of abusing prisoners he knew were innocent, adding, "We took it upon ourselves to harass them, and took them to the desert to throw them out of our Humvees, while kicking and punching them when we threw them out."

Jason Wayne Lemue is a Marine who served three tours in Iraq.

"My commander told me, 'Kill those who need to be killed, and save those who need to be saved'; that was our mission on our first tour," he said of his first deployment during the invasion.

"After that the ROE changed, and carrying a shovel, or standing on a rooftop talking on a cell phone, or being out after curfew [meant those people] were to be killed. I can't tell you how many people died because of this. By my third tour, we were told to just shoot people, and the officers would take care of us."

When this Truthout reporter was in Baghdad in November 2004, my Iraqi interpreter was in the Abu Hanifa mosque that was raided by US and Iraqi soldiers during Friday prayers.
"Everyone was there for Friday prayers, when five Humvees and several trucks carrying [US soldiers and] Iraqi National Guards entered," Abu Talat told Truthout on the phone from within the mosque while the raid was in progress. "Everyone starting yelling 'Allahu Akbar' (God is the greatest) because they were frightened. Then the soldiers started shooting the people praying!"

"They have just shot and killed at least four of the people praying," he said in a panicked voice, "At least 10 other people are wounded now. We are on our bellies and in a very bad situation."

Iraqi Red Crescent later confirmed to Truthout that at least four people were killed, and nine wounded. Truthout later witnessed pieces of brain splattered on one of the walls inside the mosque while large blood stains covered carpets at several places.

This type of indiscriminate killing has been typical from the initial invasion of Iraq.

Truthout spoke with Iraq war veteran and former National Guard and Army Reserve member Jason Moon, who was there for the invasion.

"While on our initial convoy into Iraq in early June 2003, we were given a direct order that if any children or civilians got in front of the vehicles in our convoy, we were not to stop, we were not to slow down, we were to keep driving. In the event an insurgent attacked us from behind human shields, we were supposed to count. If there were thirty or less civilians we were allowed to fire into the area. If there were over thirty, we were supposed to take fire and send it up the chain of command. These were the rules of engagement. I don't know about you, but if you are getting shot at from a crowd of people, how fast are you going to count, and how accurately?"

Moon brought back a video that shows his sergeant declaring, "The difference between an insurgent and an Iraqi civilian is whether they are dead or alive."

Moon explains the thinking: "If you kill a civilian he becomes an insurgent because you retroactively make that person a threat."

According to the Pentagon probes of the killings shown in the WikiLeaks video, the air crew had "reason to believe" the people seen in the video were fighters before opening fire.

Article 48 of the Geneva Conventions speaks to the "basic rule" regarding the protection of civilians:

"In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives."

What is happening in Iraq seems to reflect what psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton calls "atrocity-producing situations." He used this term first in his book "The Nazi Doctors." In 2004, he wrote an article for The Nation, applying his insights to the Iraq War and occupation.

"Atrocity-producing situations," Lifton wrote, occur when a power structure sets up an environment where "ordinary people, men or women no better or worse than you or I, can regularly commit atrocities.... This kind of atrocity-producing situation ... surely occurs to some degrees in all wars, including World War II, our last 'good war.' But a counterinsurgency war in a hostile setting, especially when driven by profound ideological distortions, is particularly prone to sustained atrocity - all the more so when it becomes an occupation."

Cliff Hicks served in Iraq from October 2003 to August 2004.

"There was a tall apartment complex, the only spot from where people could see over our perimeter," Hicks told Truthout, "There would be laundry hanging off the balconies, and people hanging out on the roof for fresh air. The place was full of kids and families. On rare occasions, a fighter would get atop the building and shoot at our passing vehicles. They never really hit anybody. We just knew to be careful when we were over by that part of the wall, and nobody did shit about it until one day a lieutenant colonel was driving down and they shot at his vehicle and he got scared. So he jumped through a bunch of hoops and cut through some red tape and got a C-130 to come out the next night and all but leveled the place. Earlier that evening when I was returning from a patrol the apartment had been packed full of people."

4/6/10

Satanic military murders unarmed reporters and attacks rescue van with children

Warning: this is extremely unpleasant and disturbing footage. And I've seen even worse. I've watched soldiers bragging about Iraqi girls they've raped. I've read the Taguba report and the Seymour Hersh description of sodomizing boys. I've listened to the teeth-gritting growls of the demonic hate of soldiers as they beat young protesters who were merely throwing stones. I will never forget these scenes. It is not fun to gaze upon the evil of the satanic kingdoms of this world.

Disclaimer: I don't endorse everything Alex Jones says. I understand his righteous anger; this war and this footage should make us all angry. However, I view those who support institutionalized murder as children of God whom I love and who are victim captives to the prince of this world and the kingdoms of this world.

Why would I post this latest video, then? It is important to understand the contrast between the way of Jesus and the way of the adversary, Satan. My wish is that Christ-followers would speak out against the wars of aggression and the murderous acts of the government that claims to represent them. The U.S. Empire being perceived as "Christian" is perhaps the greatest tragedy in modern times. I hope that those who take the name "Christ" would not do so in vain, but would instead represent his principles of enemy-love and self-sacrifice, rather than violence, self-exaltation, and self-preservation. I want all Christians to watch this and to realize what the church has supported. Without the aid of the Christian churches, these wars would not have taken place. It is time to repent of our marriage with the violent satanic kingdoms of this world, and to marry ourselves once again to Christ alone.

4/2/10

Dwelling on "our interests" and using coercion on Good Friday

On a day when Christians are remembering the greatest demonstration of love in all of history, it is tragic to see that politicians who claim to be Christians are finding in Good Friday an occasion to speak of aggression toward others.

Sarah Palin wrote this week,
“In a week when events in the Holy Land thousands of years ago are on the minds of millions, we would all do well to include Israel’s security in our prayers as we encourage our government to do all it can to ensure there is never a nuclear Iran able to threaten our interests or our allies.”
To the Christian, this is a confusing and perplexing statement.

The “events in the Holy Land thousands of years ago” refer to those of Jesus during what many people call the “passion week.” Perhaps it is helpful to review what these events were.

2000 years ago, God himself who created the world, shed his divine glory to become one of his own creatures. What an incredibly humble move that was. Rather than coerce or use violence toward his rebellious children, the Son came to earth to show us what God is like. In the life he lived, he healed, served, cared for the needy, and preached an alternative way to the religious emptiness or the political power of the authorities of his day. He showed his utter degrading humility when, the night he was betrayed, he got down on his knees and washed the feet of his students including (or perhaps especially) the one who was about to betray him. The Bible says that in this and in the events that followed, Jesus “showed the full extent of his love.” After the “last supper,” Jesus went and suffered immensely, as he was given over to Satanic oppression, culminating in his murder by Roman authorities, which was also a spiritual death at the hands of Satan. As Jesus was dying on the cross he asked one of his students to take care of his mother in his absence and he even forgave those who were crucifying him (and they hadn't even asked for forgiveness). In his life and in a death that exceeded in greatness that of the most honorable martyr, Jesus preached and lived non-violence, selfless sacrificial love, and kindness toward his enemies--even his betrayer and those who crucified him.

Those were the “events in the Holy Land thousands of years ago” to which Mrs. Palin refers. Contrast those events with her comments. Strangely, given the context of Jesus' life and death, her first thought is upon “our interests” and “Israel's security.” I find it to be ironic that the most unselfish series of events in all history would cause one to focus on “our interests.”

With regards to “Israel's security”, she then goes on to talk about how dangerous “Iran” is (I think she means their government) and how “Iran” (all image-bearers of God in Iran) needs to pay for their bad government. She doesn't mention how the Israeli government is a threat to Palestinians or other children of God in the Middle East; only Iran is a “nuclear threat,” despite the fact that Israel, not Iran has a nuclear armed aggressive government. She then praises the policy of imposing “crippling sanctions” on the Iranian people. These would cripple the economic livelihood of the people who happen to live under the rule of the Iranian government.

I find it very sad that one of the most prominent Christians in the world, Sarah Palin, would be moved by the events of 2000 years ago to focus on “our interests” and call for murderous sanctions against innocent people.

Jesus died on the cross to show his enemies what God is like. Unfortunately, Mrs. Palin, by taking the name “Christian” is painting a distorted picture of Christ. So, allow me to revise her remarks to correspond to a Christ perspective:

"In a week when events in the Holy Land thousands of years ago are on the minds of millions, we would all do well to model our own lives, words, and political advocacy (or lack thereof) after that of the Jesus whom we are celebrating."

What ought we to dwell on during this season? As we consider how humble our God is, as we behold the character of a loving God in the face of Jesus, and as we embrace a God who is forgiveness personified, may we be changed into the same kind of person as our God is.