12/31/08

Americans Want Balanced Treatment of Israel and Palestine

George Washington’s Blog Tuesday, Dec 30, 2008

American politicians are pro-Israel because that’s what the public wants. Right?

Wrong.

A July 1, 2008 poll found that Americans do not favor taking either Israel or Palestine’s side:

A new WorldPublicOpinion.org poll of 18 countries finds that in 14 of them people mostly say their government should not take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Just three countries favor taking the Palestinian side (Egypt, Iran, and Turkey) and one is divided (India). No country favors taking Israel’s side, including the United States, where 71 percent favor taking neither side.

But as Glenn Greenwald points out:

One can travel from the farthest right fringe of the GOP to the heart of the Democratic Party leadership and hear exactly the same thing: Israel is always right. Israel must not be criticized. Israel never bears any blame. Any action taken by Israel is justified. No matter the situation, that just gets repeated over and over like some hypnotic bipartisan mantra. Meanwhile, American citizens overwhelmingly … want their Government to be “even-handed” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Yet that view is simply ignored, disregarded, not even viable for any American mainstream political leader to express.

See also this.

As with the Iraq war, the bailout, torture, and everything else, the powers-that-be in the U.S. government ignore what Americans want and do whatever they like.

12/30/08

Christian thoughts on Israel-Palestine

Scott Ritsema
CIVICS NEWS.com
December 30, 2008



How should Christians view the on-going conflict between Israel and Palestine? Total war upon civilian populations. Terrorism. Radicalizing one's opponents. The Jewish peoples' claim to the land. These are sensitive, but extremely important issues that the Christian or any person with a conscience must face head on.

First, Christians should make no distinction between an Israeli child and a Palestinian child. And regardless of the perpetrator, "collateral damage" is a disgusting euphemism that dehumanizes image-bearers of God and masks the evil nature of the deliberate slaughter that is modern warfare. The scores of innocent Palestinian civilians that have been killed in recent days (363 dead, 1750 wounded so far...UPDATE: 399 dead, 1925 wounded) did nothing wrong, and their deaths have not been an accident. Hamas is obviously bad, but Christians must also point out the evils of the state of Israel. We should make no distinction.

Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com helps us consider the excesses of the Israeli attacks.

Any minimally decent human being -- even those who view the world through the most blindingly pro-Israeli lens possible, the ones who justify anything and everything Israel does, and who discuss these events with a bottomless emphasis on the primitive (though dangerous) rockets lobbed by Hamas into Southern Israel but without even mentioning the ongoing four-decades brutal occupation or the recent, grotesquely inhumane blockade of Gaza -- would find the slaughter of scores of innocent Palestinians to be a horrible and deeply lamentable event.

And Linda Heard points out the disproportionate violence that has become customary for the Israelis:

I believe only one Israeli has died during this current onslaught that has robbed the lives of over 320 Palestinians and wounded up to 1,000, not including those still buried beneath rubble. Once more, Israel’s response has been disproportionate just as it was in 2006 when it slaughtered 1,200 Lebanese civilians in answer to Hezbollah’s kidnapping of IDF soldiers. [...] When it comes to Gaza, said to be one of the most densely populated areas of the world, there is no such thing as a surgical strike. Moreover, over half of Gaza’s population are children under 18. Even the smartest smart bombs could not cherry-pick between resistance fighters and innocents in such a packed environment. The Israeli government knows this and doesn’t care a jot, which translates to willful collective punishment

For Israel to bomb civilians is indeed a violation of the Geneva Conventions' prohibition of "collective punishment." To kill civilians because they live near Hamas militants is wrong and illegal, and Christians should point that out, just as we speak against Hamas' violent acts. As Congressman Dennis Kucinich stated,

The perpetrators of attacks against Israel must also be brought to justice, but Israel cannot create a war against an entire people in order to attempt to bring to justice the few who are responsible ... All this was, and is, disproportionate, indiscriminate mass violence in violation of international law. Israel is not exempt from international law and must be held accountable. It is time for the UN to not just call for a cease-fire, but for an inquiry as to Israel’s actions.
As Raw Story explains, "Kucinich compared the latest bombing campaign to Israel’s earlier strikes at southern Lebanon targeted at Hezbollah. Then too, he said, civilians were killed, infrastructure was destroyed and lawlessness took hold in the country."

Unfortunately the leadership of both parties, including Harry Reid and President Bush, don't have the same moral courage as Kucinich, as they have only signaled support for Israel's actions. Obama has sheepishly refused to comment.

Amira Hass in Haaretz helps paint a picture of the horrors of Gaza in recent days:
There are many corpses and wounded, every moment another casualty is added
to the list of the dead, and there is no more room in the morgue.

Relatives search among the bodies and the wounded in order to bring the dead quickly to burial. A mother whose three school-age children were killed, and are piled one on top of the other in the morgue, screams and then cries, screams again and then is silent.

Mustapha Ibrahim saw all this on Saturday at one in the afternoon, at Shifa Hospital in Gaza. As a field investigator for a human rights organization, he thought he'd been immunized, but nothing prepared him for what he saw. Wounded people whose situation was less than serious were asked to leave Shifa, in order to free up beds.

Dr. Haidar Eid is a lecturer in Cultural Studies at Al-Aqsa University. He, too, saw the bodies and the wounded on Saturday. Also the children whose limbs had been amputated.
Beyond this, Christians must recognize and point out that our media and political establishment are extremely biased in favor of Israel. Hamas are "terrorists", but Israel "has every right to" bomb civilian populations? Really? And Kurt Nimmo points out that both sides have continually balked at ceasefires, not just Hamas, as the media portray:

Hamas has attempted to implement a ceasefire with Israel on numerous occasions. “Israel rejected a cease-fire offer from the Palestinian group Hamas as a humanitarian aid crisis erupting in the Gaza Strip threatened wider instability,” the Christian Science Monitor reported in April. “[The] Palestinian group offered to cease cross-border rocket attacks if Israel opens crossing points into Gaza and ends military incursions into the Palestinian territory,” Al Jazeera reported.

Christians must also ask difficult questions about Israel's own ties to militant Islamic groups. Nimmo points out how, in 2002, Israel was caught creating fake al Qaeda operatives, presumably for the purpose of radicalizing and demonizing the Palestinians:

In 2002, “Palestinian security forces … arrested a group of Palestinians for collaborating with Israel and posing as operatives of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist network,” the Sydney Morning Herald reported. “The arrests come two days after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon charged al-Qaeda militants were operating in Gaza and in Lebanon.” An anonymous Palestinian official told the newspaper the alleged collaborators sought to “discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide reasons to carry out a new (military) aggression in the Gaza Strip.”

And most ominously of all, it was actually Israel that helped to found Hamas in the late 1970s, with the goal of radicalizing Palestinians as a counterbalance against the secular nationalism of the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

Israeli intelligence created Hamas as a counterweight to the PLO and Arab nationalism. Israel “aided Hamas directly — the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO ,” Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies, told UPI correspondent Richard Sale. (see Yossi Schwartz, Palestine: The origins of Hamas and its role today).
Israel has funded and helped to create radical Muslim enemies. Why? Is it possible that the mainstream media are not reporting the whole story behind the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Should Christians think twice before anointing Israel as the "good guys" here? Why, in the realm of human kingdoms, do we even look for a "good guy" at all?

Last of all, how should the Christian approach the issue of the land that the Israelites were given in the Old Testament? The answer is quite simple. The Old Covenant, as it related to Israel and the Promised Land, was conditional: God told Israel over and over that if they were faithful to Him, they could remain in the land; if they were not faithful, then they had no right to the land. Therefore, since the Jews occupying the land today are not followers of the triune God, as revealed through Jesus the Son, they have no claim on the land. [Not to mention the fact that promises about the land of literal Israel have been fulfilled spiritually in the New Testament as the true Israel is the international church of God, made up of Jews and Gentiles alike, rather than one ethnic group with its national boundaries (See Chapter 6 of The Way, the Truth and the Sword).] The Christian should uphold the biblical teaching that the Jews, at a theological level, have no right to the land today, and that God's Israel has gone global, transcending ethnic and geographic boundaries.

Christians will not be "cursed by God" if they expose the evils of the Israeli government, as the fear-mongering Christian Zionists claim. Instead, if we speak out against violence, we will be doing an important service to the gospel, since the world perceives the Israeli government as being in league with the Christian West (and with the U.S. sending 3 billion a year in military aid to Israel, who can blame them for drawing this assumption?). Since Christianity is associated with the excesses of the state of Israel, we must clarify for the world that we have nothing to do with and we do not support their crimes, but that we follow a Messiah who teaches non-violence. Christians must be known for being peacemakers.

RELATED:
~Israel violates Just War principles and international law
~Israel's attacks not even based on Hamas rocket attacks
~Americans Want Balanced Treatment of Israel and Palestine

12/26/08

"Science won't intrude on climate policy," global warming critic is told

Princeton Physicist Calls Global Warming Science “Mistaken”
Michael Asher - Daily Tech - Wednesday, Dec 24, 2008



Scientist fired by Al Gore was told, “science will not intrude on public policy”.

Noted energy expert and Princeton physicist Dr. Will Happer has sharply criticized global warming alarmism. Happer, author of over 200 scientific papers and a past director of energy research at the Department of Energy, called fears over global warming “mistaken”.

“I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect”, said Happer. “Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science.”

Dr. Happer views climate change as a predominately natural process. “The earth’s climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.”

In 1991, Happer was appointed director of energy research for the US Department of Energy. In 1993, he testified before Congress that the scientific data didn’t support widespread fears about the dangers of the ozone hole and global warming, remarks that caused then-Vice President Al Gore to fire him. “I was told that science was not going to intrude on public policy”, he said. “I did not need the job that badly”. [...]

The mythical "al Qaeda" threat

Al Qaeda is More of a U.S. Propaganda Campaign than a Real Organization
George Washington’s Blog: Friday, Dec 26, 2008



Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook wrote:

Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.
Former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative”.

And see this Los Angeles Times Article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled “The Power of Nightmares”, which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on the people within the U.S. who are behind the hype).

Not only has the U.S. government hyped Al Qaeda, but it has issued numerous fake terror alerts to scare people.

There is a word for intentionally creating fear in order to manipulate opinion for political ends: terrorism.



CIVICS NEWS Comment:

Consider also this quote from former French intelligence and military officer Pierre-Henri Bunel:
The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaeda. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US.
It is always in the interest of the state to hype the fear of a foreign threat. Consider James Madison's wisdom on the subject.

The management of foreign relations appears to be the most susceptible of abuse, of all the trusts committed to a Government, because they can be concealed or disclosed, or disclosed in such parts & at such times as will best suit particular views; and because the body of the people are less capable of judging & are more under the influence of prejudices, on that branch of their affairs, than of any other. Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.
Real or pretended. Interesting.

In addition to hyping a foreign threat, it is always in the interest of the state to create and exaggerate a domestic threat. Those who would threaten the power of the state are demonized as terrorists. Consider this very important posts on those who the state considers to be "terrorists." Hint: it's you. It's anybody who believes in the Constitution as the rule of law. RELATED: Media call for dissenters to be murdered, sent to torture camps.

Stealing from soda drinkers to boost the state's balance sheet

New York’s Soda Tax Scam
Steven Milloy - Junk Science - Friday, Dec 26, 2008



New York Governor David Paterson has proposed to levy an 18 percent tax on non-diet soft drinks under the guise of combating obesity. Government doesn’t get much more cynical than this.

After alleging that “almost one in four New Yorkers under age 18 are obese,” Paterson’s budget proposal for 2009-2010 asserts that, “Significant price increases should discourage individuals, especially children and teenagers, from consumption and help fight obesity which results in higher risk for diabetes and heart disease.” So the purpose of the tax, according to proposal, is to discourage people from drinking non-diet soft drinks. [...]

RELATED:
~Governor, please use coercion to help me be more healthy...
~Steal from soda drinkers, encourage toxic Diets
~Nanny state managing health of British citizens by force
~The state not only to raise your kids, but also your pets
~Evil dairy producer finally being put behind bars for his crimes
~Student suspended for buying Skittles at school: Evil children are out of control
~"Opening a deli" without a permit: Student Suspended For "Opening Deli" On Campus
~The War on Weight
~The Nanny State: Taxation as Social Engineering

CIVICS NEWS Comment: Why do Christians get so excited about enforcing so-called "sin taxes" (taxes that punish immoral behavior). Do the New Testament Scriptures advise us or even permit us to use the violence of government to forcibly seize wealth from people who choose to live out of sync with God's will? How should we minister to people who struggle with unhealthy food/drink dependence? Steal from them? Really? Why do we feel that it's permissible for us to try to micro-manage peoples' lives through government coercion?

12/23/08

Local + Organic + No "permit" from the state = Enemy of the State

Local food cooperative searched by state
The Morning Journal: December 3, 2008



PITTSFIELD TOWNSHIP — An Ohio Department of Agriculture agent seized food, electronic devices and documents from a Pittsfield Township organic and natural food cooperative believed to be unlicensed, according to a search warrant filed yesterday in Lorain County Common Pleas Court. [...]

Cops assault 12-year-old, accuse her of prostitution

Police Get The Wrong House In Galveston, Allegedly Assault 12-Year-Old Girl
Houston Press: December 17, 2008

It was a little before 8 at night when the breaker went out at Emily Milburn's home in Galveston. She was busy preparing her children for school the next day, so she asked her 12-year-old daughter, Dymond, to pop outside and turn the switch back on.

As Dymond headed toward the breaker, a blue van drove up and three men jumped out rushing toward her. One of them grabbed her saying, "You're a prostitute. You're coming with me."

Dymond grabbed onto a tree and started screaming, "Daddy, Daddy, Daddy." One of the men covered her mouth. Two of the men beat her about the face and throat.

As it turned out, the three men were plain-clothed Galveston police officers who had been called to the area regarding three white prostitutes soliciting a white man and a black drug dealer. [...]

AP Study Finds $1.6B Went to Bailed-Out Bank Execs

AP: Sunday, Dec 21, 2008

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for many of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Global Cooling Update

Global cooling
Andrew Bolt - HeraldSun.com.au - Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008



The world sure is coldening:

The first day of winter brought wind-chill warnings, snow and a bevy of storms to cities across Canada on Sunday, potentially laying the groundwork for the first cross-country white Christmas in nearly four decades.

It’s even colder than last year:

Phillips said some parts of the country are seeing snowfall amounts that have outpaced last year’s record and near-record totals at this point in the season.

Britain is shivering, too:

After the coldest start to December for more than 30 years, and with snowfall seen in many parts of Britain as early as October, the bookmakers could reap the dividends after taking a record number of bets on a white Christmas.

Britain’s Snowboard Club hasn’t seen such snow in Europe in years:

It’s now ten weeks since the first heavy snowfalls were reported in the Alps and the snow is continuing to come down by the bucket load in many areas. http://www.skiinfo.com/ reports that apart from the duration of the snowfall obviously setting ski resorts up for a memorable season, what’s also unusual is that almost all of the world’s major ski regions have received well above average pre-season snowfall, usually one area will do better than another. However this time almost everywhere has above average snow.

In Australia, the sodden Bureau of Meteorology can’t find the drought Kevin Rudd keeps talking about:

Above to very much above average November 2008 rainfall over much of Australia largely cleared short-term rainfall deficiencies… For the 9-month period from March to November 2008, above to very much above average rainfall during November has resulted in a general easing of short-term rainfall deficiencies… Rainfall deficiencies for the 18-month period from June 2007 to November 2008 have also eased over large areas…

In Beijing they’re freezing:

Winter truly arrived in Beijing yesterday with the highest temperature of the day down to minus 8.8 ℃. Media reports say it was “the coldest day in December in the last 57 years.”

They moaned about global warming, but now they’re moaning even more about the cold:

Bone-numbing cold spread Monday from the (US) Midwest to the East, forcing millions to bundle up and scurry from place to place. Snowfall in northern New England topped 40 inches in one town, and travel remained disrupted as the days ticked town toward Christmas.
"It’s so cold, it feels like needles are pricking my eyes,” grumbled 19-year-old
Ashley Sarpong of Chicago, a fur-lined hood pulled around her face Sunday. “This
is the coldest I’ve felt all year.”

UPDATE

Dr Martin Hertzberg, a physical chemist and retired Navy meteorologist, sums up the climate - both intellectual and physical:

As a scientist and lifelong liberal Democrat, I find the constant regurgitation of the anecdotal, fear-mongering clap-trap about human-caused global warming to be a disservice to science…From the El Nino year of 1998 until Jan., 2007, the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere near its surface decreased some 0.25 C. From Jan. 2007 until the spring of 2008, it dropped a whopping 0.75 C.

Of course the federal government won't prosecute itself

International criminals
Michael Hasty - Online Journal - Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008

There is pressure building on the incoming Obama Justice Department to somehow adjudicate the war crimes committed by the George W. Bush administration, starting at the top. The political problem is that these crimes also implicate leading Democrats, thereby rendering true justice nearly impossible.

This is another compelling piece of evidence for the fact that we are living under a post-constitutional government, no longer responsible to the rule of law. If we don’t hold our leaders to the same standard of justice as the rest of America’s citizens, or any other of the world’s criminals, I don’t see how anyone could argue that this is a functioning democracy. Equality under the law is democracy’s cornerstone.

But in our post-constitutional, post-Bush v. Gore age, we already know that the judiciary is just as politicized as the other two branches of government. And under a political system dominated by the military-industrial complex, there doesn’t seem to be any such thing as a war crime.

Americans were torturing people in Vietnam and Korea. The officer in charge at the My Lai massacre, where hundreds of women and children died, served three years of house arrest.

The defense industry protects its own, and always has.

It’s hard to see how a president could get a fair verdict in this country, in any case. As David Sirota notes, “presidentialism,” which confers on that office an elevated, almost sacred character, is a basic element in America’s civil religion. We’re all brainwashed with the idea that the president is somebody who needs rows of heavily-armed storm troopers lining Pennsylvania Avenue to protect him — rather than somebody like Thomas Jefferson, who walked alone back to his rooming house to have lunch with the other boarders, after his inauguration. We’ve given the president the “emperor” status suitable to an empire. Where would you find a jury of his “peers,” outside of the establishment accessories to the crimes, like the Democrats? [...]

12/22/08

Cheney: If the Executive does it, that means it's not against the law

Cheney: If president does it during wartime, it’s legal
Andrew McLemore - Raw Story - Monday, December 22, 2008



All of President Bush’s actions during his years as a wartime leader were done with full legal authority, Vice President Dick Cheney said on Fox News Sunday.

Asked by Chris Wallace if it’s legal when the president makes a decision to help the country when it’s fighting a war, Cheney said, “As a general proposition, I’d say yes.”

“You need to be more specific than that, but clearly when you take the oath to support, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic, there’s no question about what your responsibilities are in that regard,” Cheney said.

The Vice President acknowledged that there are arguments about how Bush exercised his powers, but remained adamant that his administration stayed loyal to the Constitution.

Cheney explained that the president’s 24/7 access to nuclear codes in the event of an nuclear attack against the United States exemplifies the “nature of the world we live in.”

“He could launch the kind of devastating attack the world has never seen,” Cheney said. “He doesn’t have to check with anybody, he doesn’t have to call Congress, he doesn’t have to check with the courts, he has that authority.”

Defending policies on detainees, terrorist surveillance and intelligence gathering as justified in a time of war, Cheney said “It’s unfortunate, but I think we’re perfectly appropriate to take the steps we have.” [...]

Obama-Biden now complicit in torture and war crimes

Obama & Biden To Protect Bush Administration Criminals
Nuremberg trials also judged “a waste of time”

Paul Joseph Watson - Prison Planet.com - Monday, December 22, 2008

It’s par for the course for Obama and Biden, the men who promised “change” but in every step of their preparations for assuming office have pursued nothing but continuity, to acknowledge that they will protect criminals in the Bush administration from prosecution for authorizing torture, a complete violation of both the U.S. constitution and the Geneva Conventions.

When asked by ABC host George Stephanopoulos if top level Bush administration officials would be prosecuted for mandating prisoner abuse, Biden said that he and Obama would be “focusing on the future,” adding “I think we should be looking forward, not backwards.”

Such rhetoric goes to the very heart of the gigantic con job the “Obama change” hoax has wrought upon millions of befuddled Americans who naively presumed that voting for the lesser of two evils would result in anything other than more evil.

Perhaps Göring, Ribbentrop and the rest of the Nazis prosecuted at Nuremberg for their war crimes were following the wrong line of defense when they claimed they were merely “following orders,” they should have just proclaimed that the world should be “looking forward not backwards” and according to the Biden/Obama view of justice, they would have got off scot free.

Likewise, pedophiles and rapists who abuse children and women in ways not far removed from what was approved at Abu Ghraib should merely tell police that since the abuse and rape occurred in the past, everybody should just move on, “looking forwards not backwards”.

Obama and Biden, with their de-facto pardons of the Bush administration torture masters, are ensuring that what happened at places like Abu Ghraib, including beating people to death, raping people with acid covered batons and sexual abuse of children, will continue to happen in future without consequence.

RELATED: The record on US government torture

12/19/08

Failing to question authority leads most of us into great evil

‘Disturbing’ study reveals most of us would torture others if ordered to
UK Daily Mail: Friday, Dec 19, 2008



Most of us would torture others if ordered to do so, a study has found.

Scientists revealed that 70 per cent of volunteers, when encouraged by authority figures, continued to administer electric shocks - or at least thought they were doing so - even after an actor claimed they were painful.

Researchers at Santa Clara University in California said the experiment can only partly explain the widely reported prisoner abuse at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq or events during World War II.

Jerry Burger said: ‘What we found is validation of the same argument - if you put people into certain situations, they will act in surprising, and maybe often even disturbing, ways.
‘This research is still relevant.’

Burger was copying an experiment published in 1961 by Yale University professor Stanley Milgram, in which volunteers were asked to deliver electric ’shocks’ to other people if they answered certain questions incorrectly.

Milgram found that, after hearing an actor cry out in pain at 150 volts, 82.5 per cent of participants continued administering shocks, most to the maximum 450 volts.

The experiment surprised psychologists and no one has has tried to replicate it because of the distress suffered by many of the volunteers who believed they were shocking another person.

‘When you hear the man scream and say, “let me out, I can’t stand it,” that is the point when the real stress that people criticised Milgram for kicked in,’ Burger said.

12/18/08

Depression unfolding: Unemployment at 16.5%



Thanks to John Williams, who calculates governent stats as they were figured in the 1970s, before the finagling of Reagan, Clinton, etc.

Evil always calls itself good: Cheney on the "morality" of the Iraq war

Cheney defends war on terror’s morality
Jon Ward - Washington Times - Thursday, Dec 18, 2008

Vice President Dick Cheney offered a sweeping defense Wednesday of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism and its use of aggressive interrogation techniques, declaring “it would have been unethical or immoral for us not to do everything we could in order to protect the nation.”

CIVICS NEWS Comment: This is an unacceptable argument to the Christian. Even if you reject Jesus' teaching on non-violence/turning the other cheek/loving your enemy, even if you prefer to argue for the Christian's use of violence in self-defense, it is important to acknowledge that the million+ Iraqis (or if you're in denial, 100,000+) were not attacking Americans. In fact, the Iraqi government wasn't even attacking or planning an attack...or even capable of an attack. [Not that the presence of an aggressive Saddam Hussein would justify the killing of innocent people in Iraq] Can we finally admit that this is a war of aggression that has absolutely no moral standing?

A Christian friend of mine recently defended the war based on "America" needing to secure "our" oil supply in the Middle East. He even called oil his "life-blood," an interesting phrase for a Christian. Christians or anybody with a moral compass should be able to see the immorality of this war in Iraq. Cheney's "we killed all those people and bombed their cities to protect America" needs to be exposed by Christians, as we uphold the Gospel of the Kingdom, and tear down the lies of Anti-kingdom.

There is one thing that Cheney is correct about: we should not have done "nothing" after 9/11; he's right. We should have 1) done a proper investigation to identify the culprits and all those who were complicit; 2) if it turned out to be Middle Eastern terrorists, we should have asked ourselves what motivates them to do such things; if it turned out to be an inside job, the conspirators would be prosecuted; 3) if it was Middle Eastern terrorists, we should have learned about their legitimate grievances about America's imperial foreign policy, apologized for that murderous policy, stopped funding terrorism and stealing and killing, and ended the empire.

Mercury is now good for you, says FDA

FDA Stuns Scientists, Declares Mercury in Fish to be Safe for Infants, Children, Expectant Mothers!
Mike Adams - Natural News - Thursday, Dec 18, 2008



In a truly astonishing betrayal of public safety (even for the FDA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration today revoked its warning about mercury in fish, saying that eating mercury-contaminated fish no longer poses any health threat to children, pregnant women, nursing mothers and infants.

Last week, the FDA declared trace levels of melamine to be safe in infant formula. A few weeks earlier, it said the plastics chemical Bisphenol-A was safe for infants to drink. Now it says children can eat mercury, too. Is there any toxic substance in the food that the FDA thinks might be dangerous? (Aspartame, MSG, sodium nitrite and now mercury…)

This FDA decision on mercury in fish has alarmed EPA scientists who called it “scientifically flawed and inadequate,” reports the Washington Post. Even better, the Environmental Working Group (www.EWG.org) issued a letter to the EPA, saying “It’s a commentary on how low FDA has sunk as an agency. It was once a fierce protector of America’s health, and now it’s nothing more than a patsy for polluters.”

CIVICS NEWS Comment: It was never a fierce protector of America's health. Government agencies are at best ineffective, and (usually) at worst, controlled by the very industries they are supposed be keeping an eye on. Is it a surprise that the ICC was created by the railroads, the Federal Reserve created by the bankers, and the FDA is controled by big pharma? Of course not. When you get big government, the wealthy, influential people in society will control it to their benefit. Big goverment does not help the common man.

Detainee: Guantanamo the ‘worst place on Earth’

AFP: Thursday, Dec 18, 2008



An Algerian-born man who has just been freed from Guantanamo Bay has described the US “war on terror” camp as the worst place on Earth, in an interview published in a Bosnian newspaper.

“For almost seven years, I was at the end of the world, at the worst place in the world,” Mustafa Ait Idir told the Dnevni Avaz a day after arriving back in his adopted homeland of Bosnia.

“It would have been hard even if I had done something wrong (but) it is much harder if one is totally innocent,” he said.

Mr Idir, along with two other detainees released from Guantanamo, Mohamed Nechla and Hadji Boudella, arrived in Bosnia yesterday.

The three, who were held at Guantanamo for almost seven years, were the first inmates to have been released by the US administration of President George W. Bush under a judge’s orders.

“You can well imagine how happy I am now. We all cried together,” Mr Idir said, referring to his wife and children.

On arrival at Sarajevo airport, the trio were questioned by police and then released to be reunited with their families.

White House: 9/11 Wasn’t Foreseeable & Santa Claus is Real

George Washington’s Blog: Thursday, Dec 18, 2008


Today, White House press spokesman Tony Fratto said “No one could have anticipated” terrorists flying planes into buildings before 9/11:



Is that believable? Yes, definitely . . . as long as you disregard the following facts:

~U.S. and allied intelligence services had penetrated the very highest levels of Al Qaeda prior to 9/11.
~The government heard the 9/11 plans from the hijackers’ own mouths.
~Numerous high-level intelligence officersl say it was foreseeable (and see this)

Other than that, it is totally believable.

Career Army Officer Sues Cheney, Rumsfeld For 9/11 Complicity

Career Army Officer Sues Cheney, Rumsfeld For 9/11 Complicity
April Gallop files suit for failure to warn people inside Pentagon despite advance knowledge, as well as prior knowledge and complicity in terror attacks

Paul Joseph Watson - Prison Planet.com - Thursday, December 18, 2008



A career Army officer who was injured in the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 is suing Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld for failing to issue a warning that American Airlines Flight 77 was about to hit the building despite receiving knowledge of its approach some 20 minutes in advance.

Retired Army officer April Gallop, a ranking specialist with top secret clearance who began working at the Pentagon in 2000, has also filed suit against US Air Force General Richard Myers, who was acting chairman of the joint chiefs on 9/11.

Gallop was knocked unconscious when the roof collapsed in her office her and her 2-month-old baby sustained a serious brain injury after suffering the consequences of what Gallop describes as “two explosions”. Gallop does not believe that a Boeing 757 struck the building on 9/11. The lawsuit charges that the attack was “engineered by other means, a planted bomb or bombs and/or a missile,” citing the lack of plane debris witnessed after the attack, along with evidence from the “black box” discovered at the scene, which indicated that the plane passed low over the building immediately before the fireball was observed, as well as the complete failure of ground and air defenses which protect the Pentagon.



The official 9/11 timeline confirms that NORAD and the FAA knew that Flight 77 had been hijacked and was likely headed towards Washington at 9:24 a.m, 19 minutes before the Pentagon was struck. The gap between the second plane hitting the World Trade Center and the incident at the Pentagon was a full 40 minutes.

“The ex-G.I. plaintiff alleges she has been denied government support since then, because she raised ‘painful questions’ about the inexplicable failure of military defenses at the Pentagon that day, and especially the failure of officials to warn and evacuate the occupants of the building when they knew the attack was imminent” said Gallop’s attorney William Veale in a press release.

The suit charges that Cheney, Rumsfeld and Myers conducted a conspiracy to facilitate the attacks and alleges that other unnamed individuals had foreknowledge. The preliminary statement of the lawsuit charges that the attacks were staged so as to “Generate a political atmosphere of acceptance in which the new Administration could enact and implement radical changes in the policy and practice of constitutional government in our country.”

The text of the lawsuit lists a mountain of evidence indicating that top members of the Bush cabinet had a hand in the attacks, focusing not just on the Pentagon, but prior knowledge of the attacks and the inconceivable response to all four hijacked airliners on 9/11.

The suit cites the Project For a New American Century strategy documents as proof that top Neo-Cons were yearning for “a new Pearl Harbor” in order to whip up support for a pre-planned geopolitical agenda.

“By helping the attack succeed, defendants and their cohorts created a basis for the seizure of extraordinary power, and a pretext for launching the so-called Global War on Terror, in the guise of which they were free to pursue plans for military conquest, “full spectrum dominance” and “American primacy” around the world; as they have done,” reads the lawsuit.

Attorney William Veale says that if the lawsuit gets past a motion to dismiss, it may be the key which will unlock a plethora of disturbing questions about 9/11.

“What they don’t want is for this to go into discovery,” William Veale told Raw Story. “If we can make it past their initial motion to dismiss these claims, and we get the power of subpoena, then we’ve got a real shot at getting to the bottom of this. We’ve got the law on our side.”

12/17/08

Troops to be used in the US: From a republic to a military government

Army 'Strategic Shock' Report Says Troops May Be 'Needed' To Quell U.S. Civil Unrest
“Purposeful domestic resistance” would require military to “rapidly determine the parameters defining the legitimate use of military force inside the United States.”

Steve Watson & Paul Watson - Infowars.net - Tuesday, Dec 16, 2008
RELATED: The creeping "military form of government"


A recent report produced by the U.S. Army War College’s Strategic Institute warns that the United States may experience massive civil unrest in the wake of a series of crises which it has termed “strategic shock.”

The report, titled Known Unknowns: Unconventional Strategic Shocks in Defense Strategy Development, also suggests that the military may have to be used to quell domestic disorder.

“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, reads.

“Deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction or other catastrophic capabilities, unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters are all paths to disruptive domestic shock.” it continues.

“An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home…”

“Already predisposed to defer to the primacy of civilian authorities in instances of domestic security and divest all but the most extreme demands in areas like civil support and consequence management, DoD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.” Lt. Col. Freir concludes.

See Pages 31-32 (PDF) for quoted sections.

Freir is a Senior Fellow in the International Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He joined the think tank in April 2008 after retiring from the U.S. Army after 20 years as a lieutenant colonel. In his role at CSIS he rubs shoulders with a whole host of globalist luminaries including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft and Richard Armitage.

Echoing recent comments made by Pentagon advisors, along with other notable figures such as Colin Powell and Joe Biden, Freir also warns that the incoming Obama administration should prepare for a “first term crisis” that could act as a catalyst for such unrest.

“The current administration confronted a game-changing ’strategic shock’ inside its first eight months in office,” the report reads. “The next administration would be well-advised to expect the same during the course of its first term. Indeed, the odds are very high against any of the challenges routinely at the top of the traditional defense agenda triggering the next watershed inside DoD [Department of Defense].”

RELATED: The creeping "military form of government"

Scholar: Cheney confessed to war crime

David Edwards and Muriel Kane - Raw Story - Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley believes that not only did Vice President Dick Cheney “unambiguously” confess to a war crime during an ABC interview on Monday, but the US’ future as a nation may depend on taking action.

Asked by MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann whether Cheney had just confessed to a war crime on national television, Turley at first replied wryly, “It’s an interesting question, isn’t it? … If someone commits a crime and everyone’s around to see it and does nothing, is it still a crime?”

“It most certainly is a crime to participate, to create, to in many ways monitor a torture program,” he added. “What [Cheney] is describing is most certainly and unambiguously a war crime.” [...]

RELATED:
Cheney admits authorizing detainee’s torture
IMPORTANT: The record on US government torture

Mainstream media now calling it a Great Depression

Obama team considers $1 trillion stimulus
Option being considered would rival efforts to fight the Great Depression
AP: December 16, 2008



WASHINGTON - Anxious to jolt the economy back to life, President-elect Barack Obama is considering a federal stimulus package that could reach a whopping $1 trillion, dwarfing last spring's tax rebates and rivaling drastic government actions to fight the Great Depression.

Obama has not settled on a grand total, but after consulting with outside economists of all political stripes, his advisers appear determined to make the stimulus bigger than the $600 billion they initially envisioned, aides said Wednesday.

Obama is promoting a recovery plan that would feature spending on roads and other infrastructure projects, energy-efficient government buildings, new and renovated schools and environmentally friendly technologies. [...]

CIVICS NEWS Comment: With Obama contemplating a new "New Deal", consider how the first New Deal worked. See: Understand the New Deal . Bush is admitting that he killed the free market. Well, he's only partly right. Hoover was a mad interventionist, and FDR followed suit (yes, you read that right; what you learned in U.S. History is wrong, see Understand the New Deal!!). And of course, every president has done the same as Hoover and Roosevelt. Bush just took it to a new level as the most liberal big-government statist interventionist (read: criminal) president in U.S. History.

British officials ban scary-looking toys

Woolworths restricts light saber sales
UPI: December 15, 2008



(UPI) - Woolworths officials in Britain say the Star Wars light saber looks too much like a real gun and won't be sold to anyone under the age of 18.

Sales of the light saber, a popular toy at Christmas, are being restricted at Woolworths despite the bleak retail season, The Mirror reported Monday.

"Some companies are going the whole hog and are banning the sale of any weapon-style products to anyone under the age of 18, even if they are clearly toys like these," said Brandon Cook, who specializes in restricted sales issues for the Trading Standards Institute.

"I think it's a bit over the top in this instance," Cook told the Mirror.

RELATED: Scary, dangerous toys to be banned in Utah

12/16/08

December '08 Favorite Posts

Top Stories:
~The mythical "al Qaeda" threat
~Operation Northwoods: How to manufacture a war
~Admitted Agenda: Dictatorial World Government
~Another horrible blasphemous "patriotic" chain email
~Michael Reagan: 'Murder Palestinian babies'
~Rick Warren calls for murder
~The creeping "military form of government" also here
~NIST admits WTC7 fell at freefall speed

Other Top Stories:
~"Science won't intrude on climate policy," global warming critic is told
~Local + Organic + No "permit" = Enemy of the State
~Stealing from soda drinkers to enrich the state
~Cops assault 12-year-old, accuse her of prostitution

~AP Study Finds $1.6B Went to Bailed-Out Bank Execs
~Global Cooling Update
~Of course the federal gov't won't prosecute itself

~Obama-Biden now complicit in torture and war crimes
~Failing to question authority leads us into great evil
~Depression unfolding: Unemployment at 16.5%

~Evil always calls itself good: Cheney on "morality"
~Cheney: If the Executive does it, it's not illegal
~Army Officer Sues Cheney For 9/11 Complicity

~White House: 9/11 Wasn’t Foreseeable, Santa Real
~Detainee: Guantanamo the ‘worst place on Earth’
~Mercury is now good for you, says FDA

~Mainstream media now calling it a Great Depression
~British officials ban scary-looking toys
~Darth Cheney endorses Obama advisory cabinet

~Steal from soda drinkers, encourage toxic Diets
~Bush: "So what" if we've brought destruction to Iraq?
~Bush: ‘I Never Said The Taliban Was Eliminated’

~Cheney admits authorizing torture (a WAR CRIME)
~Ventura on CIA control over state governments
~Teachers to advance a "new system" of "a dominant global culture", Nationhood is "obsolete"

~Its Official: Torture Doesn’t Work
~Christmas Lights banned as hate material in UK
~Greece-Style Riots Coming To U.S.?

~Domestic Militarization Comes to San Bernardino
~Freemasons taking fingerprints, DNA, and dental mold
~Lou Dobbs reports on martial law again

~Sold as 'non-lethal,' Tasers killed 400 since 2001
~Constitutional Convention Immanent
~Rumsfeld said we wouldn't spend even $1 billion

~Another foiled "terror plot" may have had FBI help
~The Difference Between the Dems and Republicans
~Neo-cons call for 'indefinite detention' law

~Mind-altering drugs should be given to all
~Chemicals in our products are feminizing boys
~Poor Families Pressed Into Vaccine Trials, Babies Die

~Media pushes culture of death (Euthanasia)
~Roots of welfare/social services: EUGENICS
~The Fed not free market. Intervention is the problem

~Obama to continue Bush torture regime
~Bush commissions propagandists to re-write history
~Ron Paul on the big picture during auto bailout debate

~Obama could wipe out Iranian civilians with nukes
~Over 650 Scientists Challenge Climate “Consensus”
~Scott, what do you have against Lincoln and TR?

~Lincoln's GOP: destroying the republic for 150 years
~Big surprise: the state doesn't want armed populace
~Spying on pacifists, environmentalists and nuns

~Was Mumbai an "inside job"?
~Toronto Bans Bottled Water, Junk Sodas Remain
~10% of world crops are genetically modified

~Gift certificate for an abortion
~Obama never planned to end occupation of Iraq
~John "torture" Yoo may face war crimes charges

~Anti-terror powers used against paperboys
~Bush admin misled us on Saddam-9/11 ties
~Cardinal leads Protestants in theft operation

~Canadian Coup: Queen suspends Parliament
~Hillary Clinton Constitutionally Ineligible
~Bush admin. denies rounding up Muslims

~Bush admin. denies Downing St. Memo
~O’Reilly Whitewashes Torture At Gitmo:
~U.S. torture motivates majority of foreign fighters

State to steal from soda drinkers, encourage toxic Diet Sodas

NY Governor Paterson Proposes Soft Drink ‘Obesity Tax’
ROB HOELL REPORTING - WPIX - December 15, 2008



As if there aren’t enough taxes, you could soon be paying more for soda.

In an effort to close the $15 billion state budget gap, New York Governor David Paterson is calling for a 15 percent tax on soft drinks.

If you drink diet, you’re okay. The tax would only be imposed on regular, non-diet soft drinks.
The logic: it could generate more than $400 million while helping to curve obesity.

For that reason some public health advocates support the soda tax, hoping it will lead to healthier choices.
CIVICS NEWS Comment: "Choices?" If this is about choice, then why introduce coercion into the equation? Why is moral for government to violently compel our behavior, anyway? Lying about it and saying it's about "choice" just makes it worse. Stealing and lying. Next they'll be murdering innocents and calling it "freedom." We need to face the reality of what government is. Government can't help but constantly steal and murder and lie about it.

Hey Obama fans: Darth Vader endorses your advisory cabinet

Scott Ritsema
CIVICS NEWS.com
December 16, 2008



This line from ABC tells us everything we need to know about the in-coming Obama administration:
In an exclusive interview with ABC News, a reflective Vice President Dick Cheney praised President-elect Barack Obama’s national security team [...]
Do the former Obama fans need anything more than that? Cheney has been the arch-enemy. He is allied with Obama. Any questions?

Obama is not going to be a peace president. We're going to see more of the same under Obama that we've seen under Bush. Were you liberals ever really anti-war? Was it about principle or was it about political power?

Related:
~Obama's roster of officials...and Bush was bad?
~Obama's foreign policy team--hardcore war mongers
~Obama to promote a militantly zionist foreign policy
~Obama’s First Appointment Is Son Of Zionist Terrorist
~Globalists/banking elite to run Obama administration
~Bush supporters should love Obama; Bush opponents should oppose Obama. Seriously.
~Obama's Treasury Sec. Geithner a CFR Globalist
~Attorney General Eric Holder, "hate crimes," and internet regulation

Bush Rewrites History: ‘I Never Said The Taliban Was Eliminated’

Think Progress: Tuesday, Dec 16, 2008

Early this morning, during a press conference in Kabul with Afghan President Karzai, President Bush attempted to paper over his previous declarations of victory over the now-resurgent Taliban. Bush claimed emphatically, “I never said the Taliban was eliminated.” Watch it:



In fact, Bush used the word “eliminated” to describe the state of the Taliban on several occasions:

September 2002: “The Taliban’s ability to brutalize the Afghan people and to harbor and support terrorists has been virtually eliminated.”

April 2002: “With the Taliban eliminated and al-Qaida badly damaged, we have moved into the second stage of our war on terror.”
At other times, Bush prematurely declared victory using similar language:

September 2004: “And as a result of the United States military, Taliban no longer is in existence. And the people of Afghanistan are now free.”

December 2004: “In Afghanistan, America and our allies, with a historically small force and a brilliant strategy, defeated the Taliban in just a few short weeks.”

October 2005: “Over the years these extremists have used a litany of excuses for violence — the Israeli presence on the West Bank, or the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, or the defeat of the Taliban, or the Crusades of a thousand years ago.”
While coalition forces made significant early progress against the Taliban, President Bush allowed the situation to deteriorate after deciding to invade Iraq in 2003. Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, troops and resources have been diverted from Afghanistan. Consequently, the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated dramatically in recent years. Currently, the Taliban has a “permanent presence” in 75 percent of the country and exercises control over the country’s “political and military dynamic.”

Likewise, the still-classified Afghanistan NIE reportedly paints a “grim” picture of the country. While Bush deserves credit for trying to bring his current rhetoric more in line with reality, he isn’t allowed to pretend that his past rhetoric wasn’t false.

Cheney admits authorizing detainee’s torture

David Edwards and Stephen C. Webster - Raw Story - Tuesday, Dec 16, 2008



Outgoing VP says Guantanamo prison should stay open until end of terror war, but has no idea when that might be.

Monday, outgoing Vice President Dick Cheney made a startling statement on a nation-wide, televised broadcast.

When asked by ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl whether he approved of interrogation tactics used against a so-called “high value prisoner” at the controversial Guantanamo Bay prison, Mr. Cheney, in a break from his history of being press-shy, admitted to giving official sanctioning of torture.

“I supported it,” he said regarding the practice known as “water-boarding,” a form of simulated drowning. After World War II, Japanese soldiers were tried and convicted of war crimes in US courts for water-boarding, a practice which the outgoing Bush administration attempted to enshrine in policy.


“I was aware of the program, certainly, and involved in helping get the process cleared, as the agency in effect came in and wanted to know what they could and couldn’t do,” Cheney said. “And they talked to me, as well as others, to explain what they wanted to do. And I supported it.”

He added: “It’s been a remarkably successful effort, and I think the results speak for themselves.”

ABC asked him if in hindsight he thought the tactics went too far. “I don’t,” he said.

The prisoner in question, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who the Bush administration alleges to have planned the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, is one of Guantanamo’s “high value targets” thus far charged with war crimes.

Former military interrogator Travis Hall disagrees with Cheney’s position.

“Proponents of Guantanamo underestimate what a powerful a propaganda tool Guantanamo has become for terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda, despite several Department of Defense studies documenting the propaganda value of detention centers,” he said in a column for Opposing Views.

“For example, West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center has monitored numerous Al Qaeda references to Guantanamo in its recruitment propaganda materials,” continued Hall.

“Improvements to Guantanamo’s administration of judicial mechanisms will not make its way into Al Qaeda propaganda. Nothing short of closing Guantanamo will remove this arrow from its quiver.”

President-elect Barack Obama has promised to close the prison and pull US forces out of Iraq. Cheney, however, has a different timeline for when Guantanamo Bay prison may be “responsibly” retired.

“Well, I think that that would come with the end of the war on terror,” he told ABC.

Problematic to his assertion: Mr. Bush’s “war on terror” is undefinable and unending by it’s very nature, and Cheney seems to recognize this as fact.

Asked when his administration’s terror war will end, he jostled, “Well, nobody knows. Nobody can specify that.”

This Bush speech includes more truth than the real Bush

12/15/08

Jesse Ventura on how the CIA exercises control over state governments



Jesse Ventura: CIA Embedded in Every State Government
CIVICS NEWS Flashback: The CIA, the states, and the media

And the CIA has confirmed that the meeting Ventura tells about in his story did take place.

The new "function" of teachers in the US: Brainwash the youth into the "new system" of "a new dominant global culture", Nationhood is "obsolete"

Educators Seek Shift in U.S. Schooling to Stress “Global” Values, See Nationalism as “Obsolete”
Objectives are at the heart of an agenda that has been pursued at the highest levels of the U.S. educational system for decades
Dan Taylor - Old-Thinker News - Dec. 15, 2008



In October of 2007, the annual Frontiers in Education Conference met in Milwaukee Wisconsin. Among the several papers presented at the conference was, Critical Theory, Globalization and Teacher Education In A Technocratic Era. The paper was written by three professors, Mark Malisa, Randall Koetting, and Kristin Radermacher. The authors opening statements read,
Our perspective is that of educators who view the current world as one that is highly internationalized and intensely global, rendering nationalistic orientations obsolete. We also view education and educators as involved agents in the construction of a just social world, and contend that this implies infusing the curriculum and teacher education with cosmopolitan sensibilities, frequently, through critical theory and critical pedagogy.
The authors propose that because of globalization, education programs must be reordered. The report states that teacher education programs in the U.S. must adopt a "global perspective" and that "…the time of splendid isolation is over… purposes of education have changed."

"As globalization becomes the dominant term for describing and conceptualizing teacher education, colleges and schools of education will need to revisit their mission statements and rethink what it means to be part of the global community," the report states.

"As such, educators will have to evaluate the extent to which they function as part of a new system that creates and sustains a new dominant global culture…"

Educators in the "global world" will, "…need an unprecedented willingness to teach and be taught by the rest of the world. Part of this will involve rethinking the language and practice of nationalism… even in the classroom."

The report concludes that there will be resistance to these measures, but offers a solution,
"…a lot of work remains to be done in creating a critical consciousness that makes it possible to realize that global solidarity does not threaten nationalism."

Whether or not these professors realize it, their objectives are at the heart of an agenda that has been pursued at the highest levels of the U.S. educational system for decades. As the 1954 Reece Committee discovered, tax-exempt foundations, particularly the Rockefeller Foundations, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Foundation and others were instrumental in influencing U.S. education. Their goals, as the committee found, were international in scope.

Its Official: Torture Doesn’t Work

George Washington’s Blog: Monday, Dec 15, 2008

Those who know have repeatedly said that torture doesn’t work. See this and this.

Well, now its official.

The Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously found:

“The administration’s policies concerning [torture] and the resulting controversies damaged our ability to collect accurate intelligence that could save lives, strengthened the hand of our enemies, and compromised our moral authority.”

Can we please stop torturing now?

Hate Lights

Mother told to take down her Christmas lights… in case they offend her non-Christian neighbours
UK Daily Mail: Monday, Dec 15, 2008



A woman has spoken of how she was told to remove her Christmas lights by a housing association worker - in case they offended her non-Christian neighbours.

Dorothy Glenn decorates her home in South Shields with hundreds of festive lights every year, including a giant tree and a 4ft Santa Claus.

But she was left stunned this year when a South Tyneside Homes worker called at her house to inform her that the decorations she was displaying might be offending her neighbours.

The association last night apologised to Mrs Glenn and insisted that removing Christmas lights was not part of their policy.

The 41-year-old mother-of-three said: ‘I put the lights up in the first week of November and then recently a uniformed housing worker was outside, and it looked like he was counting my decorations.

‘When I went outside he said that the lights were “offensive to the community”. If I was offending anyone I could understand why he was telling me, but nobody has complained.

‘My neighbours are Bengali and Chinese and I know that they love the lights - the children will always point them out when they walk past.’ [...]

Thank you Federal Reserve for the bubble and its inevitable collapse

Home values to lose well over $2 trillion during 2008: Zillow
Reuters: Monday, Dec 15, 2008



Homes in the United States have lost trillions of dollars in value during 2008, with nearly 11.7 million American households now owing more on their mortgage than their homes are worth, real estate website Zillow.com said on Monday.

U.S. homes are set to lose well over $2 trillion in value during 2008, according to an analysis of recent Zillow Real Estate Market Reports.

Home values declined 8.4 percent year-over-year during the first three quarters of this year, compared to the same period in 2007, the reports showed.

U.S. home values lost $1.9 trillion from the first of the year through the end of the third quarter, and will probably fall further in the fourth quarter. One in seven of all homeowners, or 14.3 percent, were “underwater” by the end of the third quarter, the reports showed. [...]

Bush: "So what" if we've turned their country into a 6-year war zone?

CIVICS NEWS Comment: "So what" if we've killed a bunch of women and children and kick-started a civil war and a bunch of "al Qaeda in Iraq" attacks? So what if 1.2 million Iraqis are dead and another 3 million wounded? So what if 5 million more have been displaced? So what if 1.5 million were killed during the 1990s under the murderous UN sanctions? So what if we've destroyed their country? So what?

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

----------------------------------------------------------

Bush on the invasion of Iraq leading to al-Qaeda presence: ‘So what?’
David Edwards and Diane Sweet - Raw Story - Monday, December 15, 2008

In an interview with a reporter following a shoe being thrown at his head, President George W. Bush had a snippy answer for the fact that al Qaeda didn’t take a stand in Iraq until he invaded: “So what?”

Bush spoke with ABC’s Martha Raddatz following the shoe incident in Baghdad, which reportedly left White House spokesperson Dana Perino injured during the melee that ensued as the Iraqi journalist who threw the shoe was being subdued.

During the interview, Bush says his legacy will “take time,” but includes No Child Left Behind and “52 months of uninterrupted job growth,” then speaks about his role in “protecting” America after 9/11. He mentions that al Qaeda has turned out to be a problem in Iraq.

Raddatz points out that al Qaeda didn’t choose to make Iraq a base to fight from until after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Bush’s response? “Yeah, that’s right. So what?”

“Surely your legacy will be largely about this war,” Raddatz says. “Talk to me about how that feels being here.”

“There have been no attacks since I have been president, since 9/11,” he replies. “One of the major theats against al Qaeda turns out to have been Iraq. This is where al Qaeda said they were going to take their stand. This is where al Qaeda was hoping to take …”

“But not until after the U.S. invaded,” Raddatz interrupts.

“Yeah, that’s right,” Bush says. “So what? The point is that al Qaeda said they’re going to take a stand.” [...]

Greece-Style Riots Coming To U.S.

Greece-Style Riots Coming To U.S.
Troops and mercenaries will be used to detain Americans in prison camps, warns deadly accurate trends forecaster
Paul Joseph Watson - Prison Planet.com - Monday, December 15, 2008



Frighteningly accurate trends forecaster Gerald Celente says that America will see riots similar to those currently ongoing in Greece and that the cause will be a hyper-inflationary depression, leading to the inevitable use of troops and mercenaries to deal with the crisis as Americans are incarcerated in internment camps.

As we have highlighted before, Celente’s accuracy is stunning - he predicted the 1987 crash, the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the “panic of 2008,” and is routinely cited even by mainstream news networks as highly credible.

The cause of the riots would be a hyper-inflationary depression, Celente told interviewer Lew Rockwell, causing Americans to revolt in similar circumstances that we have witnessed recently in Iceland and Greece. The trouble would be sparked off by Obama declaring a “bank holiday” whereby people won’t be able to withdraw their money.

“What’s going on in Greece with these riots has nothing to do with a 15-year-old boy being killed, that was only the spark that ignited the pent up, really hatred and disdain, people have for the scandals and corrupt government and the same thing is going on in this country as well,” said Celente.

Celente reiterated his prediction of a revolution and riots in America, and said that the first signs of it could even emerge before the end of the year.

Celente said that the troops now being brought back to America for “domestic security” would be used to suppress the riots.

“There’s talk of opening all these detention centers and hiring the goon squads, the Blackwaters to run them, so these are realities going on as we speak,” said Celente, adding that the Halliburton subsidiary KBR had been awarded a half a billion dollar contract to build “national emergency” internment camps in the name of detaining illegal immigrants but that they would be used to hold rioting Americans.

“We’re really in a period of ‘off with their heads’ and its going to be the people against the politicians,” said Celente.

Celente said that a breakup of the United States was possible and that the secessionist movement was strong.

“The government owns and runs the largest mortgage company, owns the largest insurance company, they’re going to be owning a piece of the oil industry, so it’s a fight against a totalitarian government…so there’s going to be rebellions and things will change for the better if we break up these criminal governments that are in place now,” said Celente.

The forecaster added that the government was killing people for a false reason in Iraq and robbing people blind with the bailouts at home.

Listen to the interview here.

12/14/08

Domestic Militarization Comes to San Bernardino County

Big Bear Observation Post: December 14, 2008



The Marine Corps Air and Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) Provost Marshal (head of a unit of military police) and the local California Highway Patrol office will begin working together 12/12 — and through the holiday season — in a joint effort to reduce accidents and drinking and driving. The combined mutual cooperation between the Marine Corps Military Police and State enforcement officers will begin somewhere along Highway 62. The CHP will set up DUI roadblocks with the presence of Military Police. A violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Gary Daigneault discussed the ramifications of this joint effort today on his 107.7 F.M. Talk Back show. Mr. Daigneault and his callers seemed to be very concerned. On its face, one may think this is a good idea. But it’s not. I agree with Mr. Daigneault and his callers. Most of which seemed to think this is a very bad idea. Mr. Daigneault contacted a Constitutional Law expert, and the attorney informed him this is absolutely unconstitutional. It’s NOT permitted under the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, 8 U.S.C. § 1385. It’s my understanding that the Constitutional Law expert said CHP officers could be arrested out there working with the Military Police because it’s a “felony.” [...]